A Diplomatic Minefield. - The World News - Who Owns Alexander The Great It-s

— He conquered the known world before turning 30, carved an empire from the Balkans to the Indus River, and died in a Babylonian palace under circumstances still debated by historians. But more than 2,300 years after his death, Alexander the Great has ignited a new kind of war: a diplomatic, cultural, and legal brawl over who gets to claim his bones.

— The World News

The diplomatic community has begun to take the matter seriously. Behind closed doors at the UN last month, the Greek ambassador circulated a non-paper proposing a “Framework for the Neutral Treatment of Ancient Conquerors,” which would bar any state from using a dead historical figure as a “tool of contemporary territorial or cultural aggression.” — He conquered the known world before turning

“It’s nonsense,” said Dr. Theodoros Koulianos, a professor of ancient history at the University of Athens, in an interview. “We have Plutarch, Arrian, the Alexander Romance. He sacrificed to Greek gods, consulted the Oracle at Delphi, and spread the koine Greek language. This is not interpretation. This is nationalism dressed as history.” Behind closed doors at the UN last month,

The latest flare-up began last month when Greece’s culture minister, Lina Mendoni, declared in Parliament that “the Macedonian king is, and always will be, a purely Hellenic figure. Any attempt to co-opt his legacy by neighboring states is an act of historical falsification.” He sacrificed to Greek gods, consulted the Oracle

She was not looking at North Macedonia, but at a new documentary funded by a private consortium in the Republic of North Macedonia (formerly just “Macedonia,” a name dispute that took nearly three decades to resolve). The film, The King Who Was Not Greek , marshals fringe archaeological theories suggesting Alexander’s mother, Olympias, had Illyrian (proto-Balkan) roots, and that his court spoke a now-extinct language unrelated to classical Greek.