S Jaishankar Phd Thesis < 2026 >

Critics might argue that the thesis, written before India’s 1998 nuclear tests (Pokhran-II), is now dated. They contend that the rise of non-state actors, cyber warfare, and hypersonic missiles have fundamentally altered deterrence. However, Jaishankar’s work anticipated this: his focus on “regional contexts” includes non-military dimensions of power. In his recent speeches, he often reiterates that deterrence today is not just about warheads but about economic resilience (supply chains), technological dominance (5G, space), and diplomatic networking. Thus, the thesis’s core insight—that deterrence is a holistic statecraft—remains more relevant than ever. His handling of the COVID-era border standoff with China, combining military vigilance with a refusal to decouple economically, perfectly illustrates this thesis-driven pragmatism.

From Nuclear Deterrence to Civilian Diplomacy: The Enduring Relevance of S. Jaishankar’s Doctoral Thesis s jaishankar phd thesis

Jaishankar’s approach was deeply empirical and policy-oriented, reflecting his training under influential strategists like K. Subrahmanyam. He rejected purely mathematical game theory models of deterrence in favor of a political-historical analysis. The thesis meticulously examined the 1971 war and the emerging nuclear programs of Pakistan and China to demonstrate how fear of escalation had already begun constraining conventional military options. By integrating neorealist theory (which focuses on the anarchic structure of the international system) with regional case studies, he built a hybrid framework. This framework acknowledged that while the structure of anarchy forces states to seek security, the specific history of a region—its rivalries, border disputes, and cultural narratives—dictates how that security is pursued. This methodological pragmatism foreshadowed his later diplomatic style: theory guided by ground-level reality. Critics might argue that the thesis, written before