Maya chose a question from Microeconomics: “Explain how the introduction of a per-unit tax on a good can lead to a deadweight loss. Using a diagram, evaluate whether governments should always tax demerit goods.”
She wrote steadily. Diagrams first. Then definitions. Then real-world examples: carbon taxes in Sweden, sugar taxes in Mexico. For evaluation, she used the “depends on” framework: “The effectiveness depends on the elasticity of demand, the presence of merit good alternatives, and the government’s ability to enforce the tax.” Ib Econ Past Papers
She wrote her answer with cold precision. No waffle. Every sentence linked back to the text. Maya chose a question from Microeconomics: “Explain how
She grabbed a blank sheet of paper and set a timer for 45 minutes. Then definitions
At first, she froze. Her mind was a tangle of elasticities and externalities. But then she forced herself to look past the panic and look into the structure of the question. The command terms: “Explain” (10 marks) and “Evaluate” (15 marks). The hidden trap: students often forget that “always” is the keyword in part (b). The IB examiners loved an absolute.
By the end of the night, she had done three papers. Her room was a sea of diagrams, evaluation points, and examiner’s notes scribbled in red. But something had changed. The exam was no longer a monster hiding in the dark. It was a predictable machine. Paper 1 was always theory and evaluation. Paper 2 was data response and real-world application. Paper 3 (HL) was calculation and policy.
Next, she pulled out Paper 2, November 2022. The insert was a news article about rising coffee prices in Vietnam due to a drought. The questions were brutal: calculate the PED, explain two supply-side factors, and evaluate the effectiveness of a price ceiling.