Mariz de Oliveira joined Cabral’s legal team in 2017, just as public outrage peaked. The decision was explosive. Cabral was widely reviled—nicknamed “the governor of the toll” for allegedly charging contractors for every public work. Many lawyers had refused the case. Mariz de Oliveira did not hesitate.
His curriculum vitae reads like a chronicle of regional crisis: a former president impeached and later imprisoned; a murdered mayor in a crime that shook Rio de Janeiro; sprawling corruption probes that redrew political maps. To his critics, Mariz de Oliveira is a master of procedural delay and a willing shield for power’s worst excesses. To his peers, he is a constitutional purist—a man who believes that the right to a robust defense is not a loophole but a pillar.
By a contributing legal affairs writer
Mariz de Oliveira took the brief. His defense was characteristically procedural: he argued that the accusations relied on hearsay testimony from politically motivated witnesses and that the impeachment process violated due process rights. While Maia was ultimately acquitted in the criminal case (though he left the mayor’s office politically wounded), the defense strategy became a template—attack the source, not just the substance.
“Justice delayed is not justice denied,” he said after a 2021 hearing. “But it is justice wounded. I will not abandon the wound.” In a move that surprised many, Mariz de Oliveira agreed in 2022 to represent former president Jair Bolsonaro’s son, Carlos Bolsonaro, a Rio de Janeiro city councilman, in a case involving alleged digital militias and spying on political opponents. The younger Bolsonaro faced accusations of running a disinformation network. Mariz de Oliveira again leaned on procedural defenses—arguing that the investigation violated constitutional separation of powers. carlos mariz de oliveira teixeira .pdf
Mariz de Oliveira represented the Daniel family, specifically the mayor’s brother, José Daniel, who believed the official investigation was a whitewash. The attorney pushed for reopening the case, filed suits against police for negligence, and demanded access to sealed intelligence files. In 2020, he succeeded in having a new task force appointed. While no definitive culprit has been convicted, Mariz de Oliveira’s persistence kept the case alive.
“I do not defend a client’s past,” he once told a Brazilian legal journal. “I defend their constitutional future.” Born in Rio de Janeiro in the early 1950s, Mariz de Oliveira came of age during the military dictatorship (1964–1985). Unlike many young lawyers who fled into corporate law or leftist activism, he chose criminal defense—at a time when political prisoners filled secret jails and habeas corpus was often a polite fiction. His early mentors were the old-guard trial lawyers who taught him to read a case file for its silences, not just its statements. Mariz de Oliveira joined Cabral’s legal team in
Legal scholars point to these cases as illustrations of Mariz de Oliveira’s signature move: he does not necessarily prove innocence; he proves the state’s case is inadmissible. “He is a defender of the cathedral,” wrote law professor Juliana Bello in a 2018 analysis. “He believes that if the state violates its own rules, even a guilty person must walk free. That is not cynicism. That is classical liberalism applied to criminal law.” If the Maia cases made Mariz de Oliveira a regional name, the Sérgio Cabral affair made him a national lightning rod. Cabral, the former governor of Rio de Janeiro (2007–2014), was arrested in 2016 as the central figure in “Operation Car Wash” ( Lava Jato ), the largest corruption probe in Brazilian history. Prosecutors alleged Cabral led a criminal organization that extracted over R$200 million in bribes from construction companies.